Reports of study methods and findings should be clear, thorough, transparent so that the individual is able to replicate the study, interpret the data, apply the results, and understand the study's strengths and weaknesses. (Foster 2017) Prevent selective reporting of outcomes, non reporting of studies, omission of study methodology, results and inadequate reporting of harms. Include structured abstracts, checklists, flow charts, explanation documents,
Guidelines for reporting the methods and results of clinical research can be obtained from Research Reporting guidelines and Intiatives - lists the major biomedical research reporting guidelines that provide advice for reporting research methods and findings
High-quality systematic review reports should accurately document all of the steps and judgments in the Systematic Review process using clear language that is understandable to users and stakeholders. A report should provide enough detail that a knowledgeable reader could reproduce the Systematic Review. The report includes Author contributions, eligibility criteria, search strategy, information sources, study selection, strengths and limitations.review of protocol.
Guidance for conducting and reporting systematic review : Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. read the book online.
Links checked 19/06/2019